Bhattacharyya, Kumar, Singh, Sengupta, Sarfraz, Kumar, Jaiswal, Kumar, and Kumar: Surgical site infections: A review


Introduction

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are infections that occur at the site of incision for surgery and implants, that can occur upto 30 days after the surgical procedure is over.1 It contributes to about 10-30% of all hospital acquired infections. It can inflict a huge financial load on both the patient and also the healthcare giver.2 Scientific data indicates that the overall reported incidence of SSIs can be as much as 20%. It depends on many factors like nature or type of surgical procedure, the criteria of surveillance used, and the type of data obtained. 1 There is data to suggest that the true prevalence of SSIs that is currently unknown, is probably under-reported over the years.2 Several reports state that the risk of surgical site infection is about 1-3% for an elective clean surgery.3 Surgical site infections are in fact, the second most commonly encountered Hospital acquired infections (HAI) after asymptomatic bacteriuria.3 It is also associated with a mortality of about 3%, and is a significant cause of morbidity as well. 4

Type of surgeries associated

SSI is significantly more frequently found in prolonged surgeries (of more than 2 hours duration), and surgeries associated with placement of drains.5 Aseptic surgical techniques have shown to diminish the incidence of SSIs. Such techniques include minimising blood loss, controlling fall in temperature, removing dead and necrosed tissues, using drains and sutures properly, removing dead space and properly taking meticulous care of the postoperative incision.6 Rate of infection is found to be lesser in minimally invasive surgery as compared to open surgery.6 Also, several studies suggest that putting drains through a separate incision far from the incision of operation can also mitigate the risk of infection to a great extent.7 It seems that the risk of SSI also decreases when closed suction drains are used, instead of open drains.8 Mild hypothermia also increases risk of SSI by causing vasoconstriction, and altering the proper functioning of phagocytic White blood corpuscles.9

Predisposing factors

Pre-existing health conditions like increased age (>55 years) and Diabetes mellitus lead to a significantly higher incidence of SSIs than others.10 Other patient-related risk factors found to be associated significantly with higher occurrence of SSIs are: obesity, smoking and a low serum albumin concentration.11 The major sources of infection, however, are the microorganisms present on the patient's own skin and, less commonly, the gut or female reproductive tract.12

Microbiology

Most cases of SSIs are due to bacteria. Common microbes causing SSI are Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Corynebacterium spp. (diphtheroids), Serratia marcescens, and anaerobic bacteria like Prevotella spp. and Peptoniphilus spp.12 Coagulase negative Staphylococci and Enterococcus spp. are also important causes of SSIs.13 The microbial flora depends on the type and site of surgical procedure.11 These organisms are part of the host's endogenous microflora, but may also come from the operative room environment and the flora of healthcare givers.14 For instance, Staphylococcus aureus is most frequently found in SSIs occurring after breast cancer surgery.15 Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen behind most SSIs, accounting for about 30% of all the cases.16 Entry into a hollow viscera by such procedures exposes the surrounding tissue to Gram negative bacterial pathogens like Escherichia coli, Gram-positive organisms such as Enterococcus spp., and, occasionally, anaerobes such as Bacillus fragilis.17

Pathogenesis of SSIs

There are many clinical variables that can lead to SSI as an outcome following surgery.

Pathogens that cause SSI are acquired either internally from the patient’s own microbial flora present on skin. It can also come from an opened viscus or extraneously from the instruments used or the operating theatre environment. Microorganisms may also gain access to a wound after surgery, before the skin has been sealed. Less commonly, microbes from a far-away source of infection, mostly through haematogenous spread, can also cause SSI by adhering to a prosthesis or other implant or device that has been left in the site of operation. Prolonged operations increases the risk of exogenous contamination.18 In clean surgeries which do not involve laparotomy or operation in genital tract, Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the predominant microbe causing SSI ; it is associated with a poor clinical outcome. Other Gram positive bacteria like Coagulase negative Staphylococci, Streptococcus spp. and Enterococci are also incriminated but less commonly.19, 20, 21, 22 Surgeries which probe into hollow viscera like appendicectomy, colorectal, gastroduodenal, biliary tract and urologic operative procedures, exposes surrounding tissues to Gram negative bacilli like Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Enterobacter spp.,, Gram positive bacteria like Enterococcus spp., and anaerobes.23, 24, 25 In surgeries involving the head and neck region, anaerobes such as Peptostreptococcus spp., Propionibacterium spp., Prevotella spp., Veillonella spp., Bacteroides spp., and Clostridium spp., are predominantly responsible for SSIs since these bacteria are present normally in the oropharynx as commensal flora. Hence they gain access to the surgical site quite easily. 26 SSIs can be monomicrobial or polymicrobial. Polymicrobial infections are usually found at surgeries involving the oropharyngeal, axilla, perineum and GIT region because of a mixed population of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Yeasts of Candida species can also be the agents of polymicrobial SSIs.27 Occurrence of SSI depends on the interplay of 4 factors as below:

Inoculum or load of bacteria

Procedures involving the sites which are heavily colonized with bacteria like the gut (103-104 bacteria/ml of distal small bowel contents, 105-106 bacteria/ml in right colon, 1010-1012 bacteria/gm of stool in rectum and sigmoid colon having about 600 different species of bacteria) and the female genital tract (106-107bacteria/ml) are at higher risk of developing SSIs since large inocula of bacteria can harbour the wound site during the course of operation. 27, 28, 29, 30

Virulence of bacteria

The more virulent the bacterial contaminating agent, the greater is its probability of causing infection. It also depends upon the type of exotoxins they release or the nature of LPS or endotoxins present in their cell walls. Bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens and Streptococcus pyogenes need only a small dose or inoculum to cause severe necrotizing infections at the surgical site. Aerobic gram negative bacteria (like E.coli) and anaerobic colonic bacteria like Bacteroides fragilis can have a synergistic relationship in vivo that leads to heightened virulence when the two species are concomitantly present in critical inoculum counts at the surgical site.31 Antibiotic resistance can ideally be considered as a virulence feature of bacterial contaminants as well; selected patients will hence have more colonization by resistant bugs inside the colonic lumen or at the level of skin. Patients who have prolonged preoperative hospitalization, recent hospitalization for other purposes, recent history of antibacterial agent consumption for the treating other infections, or those who are admitted in chronic care facilities will be colonized with more virulent microbes than any other patient having colon surgery. They can thus be expected to have more chances of developing SSI.

Microenvironment around surgical site

Factors like hemoglobin and presence of hematoma in the surgical incision site, foreign bodies or necrotic tissue from overuse of electrocautery procedure or wound trauma from too much traction pressure also increase rates of infection even from lower load of bacteria. 29, 30 Finally, presence of dead space in the surgical incision serves as a dependent basin for the accumulation of serosanguinous fluid after the closure of the wound. This drainage basin later harbors bacterial contaminants in a watery environment that cannot be well tackled by host inflammatory or immune response.

Innate and acquired host defenses

The tissue response of the host is very important. There can be two components of the host response. Firstly there is the intrinsic, genetically programmed responsiveness that is poorly understood and possibly not affected by strategies for prevention. 28 Acquired derangement of the host immune and inflammatory response by many factors is also likely to be faced. These acquired factors may be chronic conditions like Diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney, chronic lung or chronic liver diseases. Also, there are acute conditions, namely hyperglycemia, hypoxemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypothermia or acute anemia that are associated with elevated rates of SSI. If wound contamination still continues or secondary infection occurs here, continuous activation of the complement system and other pathways can develop. It then provides a steady supply of chemotactic factors, leading to a greater influx of Polymorphonuclear Leucocytes into the wound. Monocyte takes up the role of a proinflammatory cells here with the release of many powerful cytokines. Serotonin is released from the mast cells, that causes vasodilation and enhanced vascular permeability. The combination of these two, that is intense vasodilation and increased blood vessel permeability then produces the classical clinical findings of inflammation, like rubor (redness), tumor (swelling), calor (heat), and dolor (pain).

Clinical features

Surgical site infections usually present 2-7 days after the procedure; however, with any prosthetic device they can also manifest later due to spread of bacteria from other sites. Physical examination may reveal localized tenderness, erythema, warmth and edema at the site of surgery. Purulent wound drainage may or may not be evident. 31 Pus-laden wound drainage occurs in about two-third of case of all SSIs after Instrumentation. Deep-seated infection present generally with constitutional symptoms. In rarer cases, patients might also suffer from server sepsis and end-organ failure. Deep infections often lack evident superficial features, making their diagnosis usually presumptive. An organ or space SSI may reveal a discharge of pus coming out from a drain put through the skin into the body space or organ. A collection of such purulent discharge is an enclosed area of pus and disintegrating tissue , surrounded by inflammation and epithelium, is called an abscess . 

The common clinical features include

  1. Localised pain ( this is often different to the typical post-operative pain)

  2. Wound dehiscence

  3. Unexplained persistent fever.

  4. Delayed healing of the surgical site

  5. The tissue around the surgical site can be discoloured

  6. A foul odor coming from the incision site

  7. Incision is hot to touch

Laboratory diagnosis

Management (including treatment and prevention)

  1. Complete and holistic assessment is needed for identifying the risk factors which can influence the surgical wound healing pre-operatively, intra-operatively and postoperatively. The pre-operative assessment can focus on the patient’s general health condition and coexisting health conditions. 32

  2. Managing pre-operative risk factors: There are both intrinsic and extrinsic factors that heighten the risk of an SSI. In particular, there is accumulating evidence that a patient’s age is a risk factor which is related to decreased potential for healing and also diminished immunity with aging. 32 Smoking is also a potent risk factor for SSIs; patients hence should be advocated to quit smoking. 33

  3. Managing intra-operative risk factors: The two primary intra-operative factors involved in prevention of SSIs are maintenance of patient’s homeostasis and persistent practice of effective operating room (OR) safety procedures. This includes the maintenance of normal patient body temperature and blood glucose levels, and also blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) of ≥95% all through the surgical procedure.34, 35 Finally, it is advised that the dead space, within or below the skin, be reduced as much as is possible. Also, wound trauma be reduced by gentle tissue handling and limited use of electrocautery.36, 37

  4. Managing postoperative risk factors: Managing postoperative risk factors involves continuation of the intra-operative measures, which comprise maintenance of body temperature, adequate oxygenation, clean and intact wound dressing and well-controlled pain.38

  5. Choosing an appropriate dressing or device to manage exudates and bacterial burden: Proper dressing and device should be employed to manage the amount and the nature of exudate. Antiseptic impregnated dressings can be actively bacteriostatic since microorganisms are then killed by the release of the antiseptic agent into the wound site or on contact with the antiseptic agent itself, if and when absorbed into the dressing.39

  6. Considering adjunctive therapies: The treatment of open abdominal wounds (laparostomy) has improved a lot survival, and also has enabled a higher percentage of total abdominal wall closures. The role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in open surgical wounds may also be of benefit. Consideration of HBOT must include costs to clients or families, like travelling costs and reimbursement fees for the cost of such therapy.40

Treatment

Surgical, enzymatic or ultrasound-guided debridement is also often helpful in treating SSI, along with regular antiseptic dressings. 41 Antiseptic impregnated dressings can be actively bacteriostatic when microbes are eliminated by the release of the antiseptic agent into the wound or on contact with the antiseptic when absorbed into the dressing material, as discussed previously. 41 Some dressings employ passive antimicrobial methods, when microorganisms bind to the dressing materials and are then physically removed from the wound on the change of dressing.41 Cyanoacrylate-based microbial sealants can further decrease the rates of SSI occurrence, when incorporated into the antiseptic pre-surgical dressings. 42

Conclusion

Surgical site infections can be quite challenging to detect and then treat. Prevention necessitates meticulous patient care and all required interventions. Clinicians and microbiologists should hence work hand in hand for the timely diagnosis and treatment of such infections. A uniform policy should be adopted in every tertiary healthcare facility for necessary guidance in this context.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1 

C D Owens K Stoessel Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and preventionJ Hosp Infect2008702310

2 

D J Leaper H Van Goor J Reilly N Petrosillo H K Geiss A J Torres Surgical site infection - a European perspective of incidence and economic burdenInt Wound J20041424773

3 

I Uckay S Harbarth R Peter D Lew P Hoffmeyer D Pittet Preventing Surgical Site InfectionsExpert Rev Anti Infect Ther20108665770

4 

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event. Procedure-associated Modulewww.cdc.gov

5 

V Shahane S Bhawal U Lele Surgical site infections: A one year prospective study in a tertiary care centerInt J Health Sci (Qassim)2012617984

6 

J Bruce EM Russell J Millinson ZH Krukowksi The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse eventsHeath Technol Assess2001522119410.3310/hta5220

7 

NJ Ehrenkranz JL Meakins JV Bennett PS Brachman Surgical infectionsHospital Infections. 3rd Edn.Boston: Little, Brown and Co685710

8 

M L Moro M P Carrieri A E Tozzi S Lana D Greco Risk factors for surgical wound infections in clean surgery: a multicenter study. Italian PRINOS Study GroupAnn Ital Chir1996671139

9 

A Kurz D I Sessler R Lenhardt Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature GroupN Engl J Med199633419120915

10 

S M Patel M H Patel S D Patel S T Soni D M Kinariwala M M Vegad Surgical Site Infections: Incidence and risk factors in a tertiary care Hospital, Western IndiaNat J Comm Med2012321936

11 

W G Cheadle Risk factors for surgical site infectionSurg Infect (Larchmt)200671711

12 

R D Walcott V Gontcharova Y Sun A Zischakau S E Dowd Bacterial Diversity in surgical site infections: not just aerobic cocci any moreJ wound Care20091883172310.12968/jowc.2009.18.8.43630

13 

C D Owens K Stoessel Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and preventionJ Hosp Infect2008702310

14 

A J Mangram T C Horan M L Pearson L C Silver W R Jarvis Hospital Infection Control Practice Advisory CommitteeInfect Control Hosp Epidemiol19992024778

15 

K Rolston C Mihu J Tarrand Current Microbiology of Surgical Site Infections Associated With Breast Cancer SurgeryWounds201051325

16 

A I Hidron J R J Edwards T C Patel Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare associated infection: annual summary of data reported to the NHSN at the CDCInfec Control Hosp Epidemiol200629119961011

17 

D E Reichman J A Greenberg Reducing Surgical Site Infections: A ReviewRev Obstet Gynecol20092421221

18 

P G Bowler B I Duerden D G Armstrong Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound managementClin Microbiol Rev200114224469

19 

RL Nichols Surgical wound infectionAm J Med1991915463

20 

HW Boucher GR Corey Epidemiology of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureusClin Infect Dis20084653449

21 

SP Lilani N Jangale A Chowdhary GB Daver Surgical site infection in clean and clean contaminated casesInd J Med Microbiol200523424952

22 

JB Suchitra N Lakshmidevi Surgical site infections: Assessing risk factors, outcomes and antimicrobial sensitivity patternsAfr J Microbiol Res2009341759

23 

GAJ Ayliffe AP Fraise AM Geddes K Mitchell Control of Hospital Infection. A Practical Handbook4th Edn.London: Arnold200021938

24 

A Ramesh R Dharini Surgical site infections in a teaching hospital. Clinio Microbiological and epidemiological profileInt J Biol Med Res20123320503

25 

R L Nichols R E Condon Antibiotic preparation of the colon: failure of commonly used regimensSurg Clin North Am19715112233110.1016/s0039-6109(16)39343-4

26 

I Sobottka K Wegscheider L Balzer R H Böger O Hallier I Giersdorf Microbiological analysis of a prospective, randomized, double blind trial comparing moxifloxacin and clindamycin in the treatment of odontogenic infiltrates and abscessesAntimicrob Agents Chemother201256525659

27 

H Singhal K Kaur C Zammit Wound infection. Emedicine2008

28 

T I A Sorensen G G Nielsen P K Andersen T W Teasdale Geneticand environmental influences on premature death in adult adopteesNew Engl J Med19883181272732

29 

W L Hao Y K Lee Microflora of the gastrointestinal tract: a reviewMethods Mol Biol2004268491502

30 

L G Rubin Bacterial colonization and infection resulting from multiplication of a single organismClin Infect Dis19879348893

31 

A B Onderdonk J G Bartlett T Microbial synergy in experimental intra abdominal abscessInfection and Immunity19761312226

32 

A Teija-Kaisa M Eija S Marja L Outi Risk factors for surgical site infection in breast surgeryJ Clin Nurs2013227/894857

33 

F Durand P Berthelot C Cazorla Smoking is a risk factor of organ/space surgical site infection in orthopaedic surgery with implant materialsInt Orthop20133747237

34 

N Brick Cochrane Nursing Corner: Perioperative glycaemic control regimens for preventing surgical site infections in adultsAORN J20139344912

35 

F J Belda L Aguilera J Garcia De La Asuncion Spanish Reduccion de la Tasa de Infeccion Quirurgica Group. Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection: a randomized controlled trialJ Am Med Assoc200529416203542

36 

L Spruce Back to basics: preventing surgical site infectionsAORN J20149956018

37 

D Leaper D Fry M Granick L Teot Management of surgical site infectionsSurgical Wound Healing and Management. 2nd Edn.Informa Healthcare11019

38 

National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (2008). Clinical Guideline 74. Surgical Site Infection. Prevention and treatment of surgical site infection2008http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg74/resources/guidancesurgical-site-infection-pdf

39 

P Vowden K Vowden K Carville Antimicrobial dressings made easyWounds Int20112116

40 

H L Orsted D K Keast J Kuhnke Best practice recommendations for the prevention and management of open surgical woundsWound Care Canada201081634

41 

D Keast D Swanson Ten top tips: managing surgical site infectionsWounds Int201453138

42 

Microbial sealant to reduce surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft Health Policy Advisory Committee on Technology Technology Brief. State of Queensland, Australia (Queensland Health) 2012www.health.qld.gov.au



jats-html.xsl

© This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 05-07-2021

Accepted : 06-08-2021

Available online : 01-09-2021


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmmtd.2021.027


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 146

PDF Downloaded: 51



Wiki in hindi